|
24/7
all rights reserved by Mistress Steel
comments or email
SteelBfl@sonic.net
http://www.steel-door.com
Long Term Relationship. 24/7 simply means 24 hours a day - 7
days a week. Not so simply, it usually means the desire for
lifetime commitment or a relationship with many or most of
the same attributes that are familiar to all of us in it's
vanilla counterpart - the marriage.
Much of the modern D/s (Domination/submission) community closely
resembles or mirror's tradition. Except, that in many ways the
level of expectation between the partner's within the relationship
tends to be stronger. The community that we see today is quite
similar to what we would call a 'normal' relationships of 100
or more years ago in lots of ways. D/s being the Domination of
one partner 'over' the other partner within the relationship.
There are some indications that people sense the 'casual
integrity' of the conventional marriage contract today and
it's often limited personal commitment and reject its
apparent acceptability by today's society and that
some of the rapid growth of the D/s community can be
directly traced to people's dissatisfaction in this
phenomenon. People seek strength. Many people see societal
weakness in this current permissive environment and desire to
find the 'image or substance' of the type of community
and security that they believe was normal in the time of
their grandparents.
With change comes a sense of insecurity and a feeling of
internal restlessness. There is often a strong sense
of chaos or for the individual the feeling of being
lost. From a females perspective this alteration has
offered unknown freedom's in the areas of physical
and financial independence and with those freedom's
the anxiety of not knowing if their mate has the
personal resolution to stand next to them through
thick and thin. In many cases men tend to view these
new freedom's as adequate to relieving them of
personal responsibility to remain within their
relationships when problem's occur or when things
get difficult. Another aspect which should 'not' be
overlooked is a growing desire on both sides to
experience the opposite of traditional expectation.
For many people this is probably the first time
historically when it is relatively permissible to
explore feelings which as recent as 20 years ago
could devastate one's personal life, career, and
reputation should such feelings be openly displayed
or exposed. The responses to these changes are often
quite different from one gender to the other, in
many ways female submissives tend to be actively
seeking the 'strength' of the traditional male (even
in fem/fem relationships), while many male
submissives seem to be actively desiring to shed
that role and find wholeness along pathways of
previously unexplored aspects of their personalities
and inner self.
We are all a product of thousands of years of evolution,
experimentation, mutation and success. What we
consider to be tradition today is really only
tradition from the viewpoint of a very short
timeframe. Today's traditions have been prominent
less than 2000 years and most of the organizational
aspects of 'male dominant', 'female submitting' can
be traced to patriarchal imposition of behavior by
religious organizations and governments. There have
always been suggestions that this patriarchal
framework was 'the' model for humankind in more
ancient or primitive societies, however, this may be
less true than it might appear on the surface.
Modern primitive tribes of people who have been
'detached' from interaction with the larger
populations of man often structure their societies
without what we consider traditional patriarchal
dominant structures. So, even as we speak, our
understanding of human history continues to be
written and rewritten as we are forced to consider
that what might be the most prevalent model for
human relationships are forms of shared domination
where one partner dominates some decisions and the
other partner dominates other decisions in a
cooperative effort to make the 'family' more
successful. If you look closely at our own societies
you will see evidence of this type of behavior in
virtually every culture.
There is much within D/s that draws on the desires of those
looking at it from the outside. There is the image
of strength, purity, sensuality, eroticism, the
removal of puritanically imposed sexual restraints
coupled to ideologically superb traits such as
loyalty, honor, respect, integrity, trust,
truthfulness and commitment. Living 'to' those same
images is vastly different or more challenging.
It has become cynically acceptable to 'expect' failure within
relationships. These expectations in some ways offer
people an avenue of mental escape from the integral
'value' of their own words, oaths or commitments.
They 'know' that if they have a problem in their
marriage that friends, family and coworkers will
shake their head and nod in commiserate
understanding and they will personally experience
little or no 'loss of face' or reputation for that
failure.
For D/s to work the individual's 'word' has to have meaning or
value. One of the fundamental foundations of the
relationship is 'trust'. If your word is 'fluid'
then you cannot establish and sustain this
fundamental 'trust.' This alone requires the
'unlearning' of vanilla habits. A person who
actively demonstrates a 'failure' of their word or
oath within D/s becomes untrustworthy - (this is for
either Dominant or submissive). Without fundamental
trust the relationship will cease to exist in any
type of positive or growth state.
It becomes 'crucial' to say 'clearly' exactly what you mean and
to listen 'carefully' to hear 'exactly' what your
partner says to you. We have often been taught to
try to 'say' what we believe other people wish to
hear instead of the truth. Truth alone can be blunt
and unkind, it is also the edge of the blade that
does far less damage than one that is blunted by
false veneers. Honesty is essential. Hiding or
masking anything will quickly lead into a morass of
problems and most often the severing of the
relationships potential. To be believed you 'must'
be believable. If your word can be found to be weak
or tenuous then you will not be trusted, respected
or valued.
Many people race toward a 24/7 relationship with their eyes
filled with it's potentials. Colored viewpoints
based on fantasy, desire, unrealistic expectations
and completely erroneous ideas on who they
themselves are inside. Reconciling the 'image' to
the 'reality' takes time, hard work and usually
years of effort and compromise. Developing or
embracing the 'whole' of yourself is not something
that will occur ten minutes after you find your
first D/s chat room conversation or the day after
your first real life experience. It is a process
that is filled with struggle. One submissive that I
know describes it this way... "submission is
often like an insurrection, a constant war within
myself that my desire and will control and engage."
Submission is not a constant, it is not selected or
chosen and then simply 'in existence' in a single
moment or choice. Nor is domination a constant. To
suggest that it is denies the 'fullness' of the
inner self. Dominant's feel as many moments of
vulnerability and personal weakness as any other
human. Being able to openly experience these moments
without censure or judgment is also part of being
whole. Often a new Dominant will believe that
'showing' these 'weaknesses' will make others lose
respect for them. In reality the reverse is true.
The removal of response to 'perceived shame' is a
demonstration of strength. Embracing the entirety of
yourself will strengthen and reinforce the ego or
the core platform from which you live.
24/7 requires that both individual's actively focus on positive
growth within the relationship. It becomes mandatory
to develop new skills and personal flexibility to
adapt to the unique desires and needs of your
partner. It requires the selective and again active
removal of ingrained vanilla habits of response or
expectation driven reactions. A full time 24/7
relationship will not survive lies, dishonesty,
casual oaths, or any demonstration of a lack of
trustworthiness.
The ramifications of failure for a D/s couple are often
more devastating than similar consequences in a
vanilla relationship. In general, the investment is
deeper, especially if that same D/s couple is
actively (as most are) involved in BDSM. D/s
requires more from people. The levels of commitment
and responsibility are significantly higher. As,
will be the subsequent challenges and stresses for
everyone involved in the years that follow the
initial choice to join together. Such relationships
should not be entered into quickly or casually. Time
is not an enemy here. Take the amount you need to
carefully investigate all aspects of your potential
partner before moving forward into the depth of full
or intense bonding and potentially considering a
full time relationship or 24/7.
all rights reserved by Mistress Steel
comments or email
SteelBfl@sonic.net
http://www.steel-door.com
The information on this page is designed to inform and entertain, it is
not meant to offer professional or legal advice. The content of this
webpage may be excerpted from
Extreme Space, The Domination and Submission Handbook,
Safe, Sane and Consensual, Dangerous Choices
or other books by F.R.R. Mallory, all the content is copyright
protected under United States and International
Copyright Law. Please click on the book title for
information on how you can order a copy of these
books and others by F.R.R. Mallory.
For limited release, re-posting, web-sharing information
regarding any of the articles on this website, or to
sign up for the Steel-Door Newsletter direct
mailing, please email
SteelBfl@sonic.net
|