|
Please Stop Breaking Canes
By
Laura Goodwin
The cane is being widely misused, which I deplore. What in heaven's
name are people doing with their rattans to break them!? I have a
half-dozen rattans in my collection, one which I've used often for
nearly twenty years. I usually leave significant welts with them,
but have never broken one yet. I've never soaked, oiled or varnished
any of them: it's unnecessary! Rattan (in my experience) is wonderfully
durable.
People, use the thing properly. When rattans are "wrapped"
one too many times, or are used to swat bony instead of fleshy areas,
that causes breakage. Generally the rule is to keep your whipping arm
close to your body, with the elbow in against your torso, and swing
with only the forearm. The tip (last four inches) should be striking
the target area (A fleshy area. Traditionally the buttocks.), and
the same area shouldn't be struck repeatedly... move it around. There
should be distinctive separate stripes raised, not just one big
bruised area.
All this full-arm showoffy stuff and other unconventional
caning methods lead to breakage. It's not normal. It's
certainly nothing to brag about, you... you... Vandals
and Visigoths!
Witless 1: "I broke a cane over my sub the other day."
Witless 2: "That's nothing! I broke your paddle over
your sub the other day!"
Both: "Har! Har har!"
The new synthetic rods are as flexible and weighty as a good
rattan, but are less likely to break, plus they are washable.
So, if you insist on raising bloody welts on one person after
another all over the place, for heaven's sake DON'T use rattan,
and give that lovely, old-fashioned domestic discipline tool a
bad name.
And leather handles on a rattan stick? Why gild the lily? Why
are people painting rattan and varnishing it!? Stop it, all of
you! You're giving me a case of the vapors.
I can't explain the physics involved, but the tips and even the
shafts break from using the cane improperly. I'm sorry if this
message seems harsh, but it's the truth.
Rattans are not sold green and fresh. They start off dry. If
you soak them it seems obvious to me that they may be spoiled
by this. Some might take a nice dry piece of toast and then
soak it in milk, but not me.
Varnish and paint will no doubt crack from all the flexing
and impacts, and will need to be reapplied. I can't imagine
why anyone needs to improve in any way on a thing which nature
designed perfectly.
Rattan is best if left in its natural state, and used judiciously.
If you are just going to whip people with a stick, then simply
cut a switch as our frontier foremothers did, and throw it away
after you have flailed your victim silly. This disposes of the
evidence of your savagery, while relieving you of the need to
clean blood off of the thing before you start on your next victim.
I have a fine, white, ~peeled~ rattan in my collection, and it's
like suede vs. leather. The rattan "bark" or skin is
quite beautiful I think, but the peeled rattan is an interesting
novelty, although naturally more porous. It is not bloodstained.
It's vulgar to break the skin with a rattan.
If a rattan is very shiny, it's been varnished. The natural rattan
bark has a soft luster, not a high, hard gleam.
If you go to buy a brass bed, you are given a choice. You may
buy brass that's varnished, and this will look just like polished
gold. The idea here is it will retain its shine without constant
polishing. An unvarnished brass will not look so shiny, even if
it's highly polished. It will require frequent polishing, and
in general will be a bit of a nuisance. So why is unvarnished
brass more expensive? Usually something less desirable is less
expensive. Surely sending brass headboards out unvarnished
saves a step and cuts production costs, so why the illogical
price?
A new, ultra-shiny, varnished brass smiles brightly, its smile
frozen and false. Soon you learn to ignore it, the way you
ignore the obvious, false smiles of models in toothpaste
commercials. It becomes just another piece of furniture, when
the novelty wears off. Well, the varnish on the brass will
begin to flake off, leaving ugly areas which will need to
be polished to match the rest of the bed. You can reapply
varnish, but the smooth finish is lost forever. Soon you
have, not an heirloom, but a piece of flaky junk you have
to palm off at a yard sale. This is not the fault of the
brass: it did what it could.
Meanwhile, the person who bought the unvarnished brass is
slavishly polishing it faithfully, and keeping it beautiful
the old-fashioned way. All the love they lavish on it increases
its value. The brass isn't mute, but expresses itself by
darkening, and shining brightly every time it's shown some
love. Walking in to see the bed has been polished and the
sheets are fresh says volumes without speaking a word.
People treat relationships the same way. Beware of the person
who is too easily impressed by new shininess, as opposed to
real value. Some things are worth working to preserve, and
some things are perfect as they are, pure, simple, and
unadorned.
It's human vanity and folly to be constantly trying to improve
on nature. Sometimes it's best to simply let things be, and
appreciate them. I don't need shiny plastic clothes to be
waterproof, nor to look beautiful, and neither does my cane.
Naked, and with nothing but a plain rattan, I'm sure I could
be quite impressive enough. :)
My oldest cane, the venerable "Old Reliable",
offers mute testimony that a cane can remain flexible and
unbroken even after years of hard use, with no special care
whatsoever. Actually, that's not true. I very carefully avoided
dipping it into anything, and I never used it incorrectly. The
grateful stem repaid me with years of good service, with no end
in sight. These are facts, the evidence of which stands ready to
display itself before your very eyes. I can also round up some
of my recipients of canings past who will be happy to swear upon
their lives that I was never too gentle with it. :)
I'm not saying don't be severe with your errant underlings...
whip them, beat them, yes! The guilty know they deserve it.
But the rod is an innocent tool, please don't abuse it.
This essay and all site contents Copyright
L. Goodwin
1990 - 2002
|