|
My Life As A Dom
By Mistress Veronika Frost
From Issue 2.1 - September 1995
Doms are Part, Not All, of SM Scene
What comes to your mind when you think "dominatrix"?
If you're like many people, your image includes whips
and chains, corsets and thigh-high boots, and a stern
(or perhaps maternal) demeanor. Like most stereotypes,
these have an element of truth. But underneath the
leather, and behind the public facade of the
leather/SM/fetish scene as a whole, there are
multidimensional individuals with a full range of human
desires, hopes, anxieties, stresses, and joys.
For many people, especially those in areas without an
open SM community, the image of the dominatrix may be
their first exposure to the world of SM. And these days,
it seems that anything having to do with SM is tre's
chic. Clubs with an BDSM (Bondage/Discipline/Domination/
Submission/Sadism/Masochism) theme are increasingly
popular. Fetish styles (leather, piercings) appear in
fashion magazines and on MTV. Guardian sex columnist
"Ask Isadora" Duncan describes SM as
"pop-culturalized." The mainstream media portrayal
of SM has moved away from the traditional pornographic image
of the dominatrix as a cruel vixen and the SM scene as one
of unabashed horror -- definitely not "safe, sane, and
consensual" -- to images that range from naughty
titillation to lighthearted fun.
The San Francisco Examiner recently featured a story
(July 31) that claimed to be "an inside look at the Bay
Area's S&M scene." In reality, what they looked inside
was a couple local houses of B&D. Once again, because
the community as a whole is understandably reluctant to
expose itself to journalists with dubious agendas,
professional dominants are made to stand in for the SM
scene as a whole. The title, "Slaves to the Business,"
gives an indication of the article's slant on
professional SM. The story dwells on the women's attire
and appearance ("ample cleavage," "red talons"). The
interviewees did not include the well-known, highly
experienced independent dominants, but focused instead
on what I call the "youth and beauty market." The
article did a reasonable job of describing the types of
work many professional dominants do (the range of
clients and fetishes are similar to what I see in my own
work) and the variety of motives women have for entering
the business. And yes, the story included the
now-obligatory reference to the Internet as a source of
inspiration and a medium for advertisement.
Rather than demonizing SM, the story normalizes it,
quoting a medical examiner, therapists, and a member of
the SFPD vice crimes divisions. Inspector Michael
Curran, after noting that from what he's seen, houses of
domination are very aware of health and safety, says,
"What is tolerated in San Francisco will not be
tolerated in Dump Truck, Iowa. I think there's a certain
tolerance because it's between consenting adults. And
hey, different strokes for different folks." It's
notable that the article focuses on heterosexual SM
(although I'd bet the majority of pro Doms are bisexual
or lesbian), even though San Francisco is world-renowned
for its gay and lesbian SM communities. In fact, the
article seems to sanitize SM by disassociating it from
homosexuality. Dr. Boyd Stephens, the city's chief
medical examiner, says "At that time [the 80s], there
were a large number of S&M deaths in the homosexual
community. Today, there's more safety awareness and
closer monitoring of the scene." As if the "old guard"
of gay SM didn't have the major role in inventing the
current community standards of safety and consensuality,
now it's implied that they could learn a few things from
the folks at Bondage-a-go-go!
A recent trip to the video store revealed several
newish films that contain some SM or fetish element.
Anne Rice's "Interview with the Vampire" features dark,
gothic sexuality, and "everyone" knows that Rice is also
the author, under other names, of some of the most
popular contemporary SM-themed fiction. One of those
pieces, "Exit to Eden" has itself recently been made
into a movie. The film features a fantasy SM island run
by a beautiful young mistress who discovers with the aid
of an unruly but cute slave boy that she can have
"bondage and babies too." While her behavior would no
doubt appall many a dominatrix, I had to appreciate the
portrayal of the mistress as a real person who can be
all-too-human. Unlike many past films, the SM
practitioners do not need to meet an ugly demise to
drive home a moralistic message. It's not that the film
isn't moralistic - it's just not moralistic about SM.
The message seems to be that a little kink is fine, as
long as it's done in the context of traditional family
values.
While such portrayals may appear silly and
trivializing to the seasoned SM afficionado, in another
sense they should gladden our hearts. In our
increasingly repressive and censorious political
climate, a newspaper article that offers titillating
coverage of the superficial aspects of professional SM
and a movie that portrays SM as lighthearted naughty fun
are a big improvement over images of SM people as evil,
sociopathic freaks. It is indeed true that some of us
may at times enjoy being freaks and thumbing our noses
at mainstream respectability, but there's also something
to be said for being able to live one's SM lifestyle in
a matter-of-fact way. As with the recent phenomenon of
"bisexual chic," I'm happy that more people are taking
an interest in SM/leather/fetish, at whatever level of
depth or seriousness. Those who start by dabbling out of
curiosity or a desire to try the latest fad will at the
very least be exposed to the community and learn that SM
people are real regular people and not scary monsters
(the best antidote to bigotry), and at best discover
that they have finally found a place they truly belong.
|