|
SM: A View On SadoMasochism
by Don Miesen
Table of Contents
Forward
This essay attempts an introduction to SM, or Sadomasochism. It is
based on my own 16 years in SM, with about 200 personal encounters;
on the stories of some close personal SM friends; and on the accounts
of perhaps 400 people met through
The Society of Janus
(an SM education and support group). I have tried especially to answer
the questions usually asked by newcomers to SM, as well as to offer my
own ideas about what SM is, and its place in the order of human affairs.
Aspects and Examples
SM is the neighborhood kids playing cops and robbers, and the contented
excitement of the victim--all tied up and the center of attention. SM
is when the belt hits--first it stings, then it's warm.
SM is the woman doctor from out of state, whom you keep chained up all
weekend, and your friends come to help you abuse her in every possible
way.
SM is trying to piss in bondage, while your mistress holds your cock,
and makes comments. SM is the quiet typist by day who becomes a
whip-wielding dominatrix by night. SM is the sweat, and wondering
if you're going to pass out, and finally letting go.
SM is Sunday brunch at an SM bar, and even though you're a straight
couple, the leathermen know you're into it too. SM is a pair of tiny
gold handcuffs on an expensive dress at the opera. SM is putting your
boyfriend into a French maid outfit, to serve lunch to you and your
girlfriends, who are into women's lib.
SM is screaming, "That's ONE, SIR! THANK YOU, SIR!" at the
top of your lungs. SM is the gratitude, all your life, to the person
who helped you come out. SM is trying to explain the massive frame
and eyebolts to your landlady. She listens with flat eyes and you
know your lease is ending. SM is finding the perfect pair of boots.
SM is your new slave, blindfolded, masturbating, and telling his
secret fantasies, while you watch and listen to every marvelous
detail. SM is sleeping with your hands and feet bound, and the
dreams! SM is the man at the party who asks to try on your handcuffs,
"to see how it feels."
SM is the proud African youth in National Geographic, with skewers
through his tongue and cheeks, and knowing that you both know the
pride. SM is forgetting to take off your steel cockring, and it
sets off the alarm at the airport. SM is how hot her ass feels when
you caress the welts.
SM is putting up with a picky, uncertain submissive, novice-new, who
doesn't know how to say what he wants to say; but finally he says it,
and takes your breath away with the magnificent totality of his submission.
SM is hearing people talk about how bad SM is, knowing nothing about it,
and you want to giggle, because they're so serious.
SM is your slave holding up her hair, without being told, as you put
on her collar. SM is the perfume of sweaty leather. SM is the anniversary
when your lover has a gold ring put through your labia (and no anesthesia);
then she holds you and say you're hers forever; and you'd do anything for her.
SM is Errol Flynn chained up by pirates. SM is the uniform in your closet,
waiting for Saturday night. SM is being taken downstairs, and you see it's
soundproof.
SM is hurting the one you love, just exactly right. SM is wondering what
the other executives would say if they knew about the welts and the
sticky panties underneath your conservative suit.
SM is wishing you could afford one of everything at an SM shop. SM
is how warm and tingly your nipples feel when the clamps are perfect;
then the little bite more, and how your nipples adjust to enjoy that,
too.
SM is the humiliation of discovering that your new slave is far
more experienced than you are.
SM is spotting an ancient gay masochist on the bus: short
haircut, polished boots, tattered levis and jacket, heavy
chain and padlock around his neck, tattoos sprouting out of
his collar and cuffs--quiet, upright, proud, centered, and
content.
Definition
SM is erotic play based on deliberate roles of domination and
submission. SM is fun play and also serious play, because we
consciously choose our roles of domination and submission
according to our actual erotic fantasies. In SM, we act out,
fulfill, and make real our erotic fantasies. How does SM make
our fantasies real? Domination and submission are reciprocal
roles, in which each can be the reality for the fantasy of
the other.
When my outer role matches my inner fantasy, I manifest more
energy; when my partner's role and energy affirm mine, our
energy interacts and multiplies incredibly, and we create
our own shared reality. SM is often called a power exchange.
The energy is immense. You have to experience it to believe
it, or to understand it. SM is like vanilla sex (ordinary
lovemaking) in that each excites and fulfills the other in a
reciprocal interaction. But vanilla sex excites and fulfills
our physical desires; it puts aside our intellectual faculties.
SM excites and fulfills our fantasies; and this stimulates our
observation, analysis, and criticism.SM is deliberate fantasy
and play. As such, it belongs among the arts.
Whenever we think what makes eroticism good, we naturally think
in terms of anticipation, excitement, tension, relaxation, rhythm,
style, surprise, sensations, textures, delicacy, power, imagery,
relief, fulfillment, and so on. These are the analytic terms of
the arts (and of the performing arts, at that). They are not
the analytical terms of theology, medicine, science, ethics,
nor politics--though all of these have claimed sexuality for
their domain. To be sure, all these other disciplines have
important things to say about sex and eroticism; but they are
in the nature of limits; they are not of the essence. With
art, with deliberate fantasy and play, shelter becomes architecture;
food becomes cuisine; clothing becomes fashion; speech becomes
poetry--and the uncritical joys of vanilla sex may become the
deliberate joys of SM.
Common Concerns, Uncommon Facts
SM is not trifling nor aberrant. Fantasy and play are universal,
and SM is everywhere, in all cultures, all societies, all historical
periods. I think SM must spring up spontaneously whenever people
learn deliberate fantasy and play. Surveys show as high as 50%
of Americans have SM fantasies or experiences. Probably most SM
occurs in the setting of conventional marriages--right at home.
SM is not sexist. Sexism tries to impose dominant-submissive roles
according to our physical sex organs. SM lets us choose our roles
according to our fantasies. Thus SM includes dominant women and
submissive men. Many feminists misunderstand and disapprove of
SM. Yet nearly all sadomasochists support feminism as a movement
towards honesty in relationships.
Some people think SM is wrong because they think people should
be as equals in sex. But that's simplistic politics and simplistic
sex, too. We human beings are equal only in law; otherwise we're
all different, individual and unique. SM, like other good relationships,
honors individuality by using the talents of each for the good of both.
SM is not mental illness. SM is deliberately chosen, controlled, shared,
integrating, and healthy. Specifically, SM is integrating and healthy
because it reconnects our fantasies to real relationships with real people.
Don't be afraid of words like "sadism" and "masochism."
Sadism comes from the name of the Marquis de Sade (1740-1814). Masochism
comes from the name of Leopold von Sacher-Masoch (1836-1895). Both men
were positive, moral, and creative--and were highly recognized for it.
DeSade was a first cousin to the King and went to school with him;
yet he supported the Revolution and was so respected that his commune
elected him a judge. A later France elected von Sacher-Masoch to be
a Chevalier of the Legion of Honor.
About 1886 - a century ago - Krafft-Ebing invented the words sadism
and masochism. At that time, Western psychology was still embedded
with Victorian prudery, and had some time more to wait for the mature
works of Freud. DeSade was a bitter and scandalous social critic; he
can easily be misread. But both he and von Sacher-Masoch were fearless
in their erotic fantasies, and they can show us how our fiercest
fantasies come from the same place as our most tender loves. They
deserve honor, not blame, for opening this truth to us.
Psychology has reaped an undeserved credit for discovering a perfect
word, sadomasochism; but the reality has always belonged to us.
Krafft-Ebing was wrong to take these names for sickness; moralists
and too-ardent feminists are wrong to take these names for evil; and
we sadomasochists are right to reclaim these names, and take them back
again for something good.
Isn't SM Dangerous?
Outsiders often see SM as bizarre and destructive. Some think sadists
do whatever they want to masochists; and that masochists somehow enjoy
suffering for its own sake. Beginners fear the SM can get out of hand
and lead to mayhem. The media often like to sensationalize SM as
immoral, drug-oriented and dangerous. The public loves all this.
It sells papers. But it's not true.
The truth is that SM is highly communicating, supportive and safe.
SM is fantasy-sharing, which can only be consensual. You can't share
and develop fantasies even with someone you feel merely neutral about,
because you won't be able to get the heightened energy and feedback
and affirmation you need.
The Society of Janus,
for example, insists that "all SM can and should be consensual,"
meaning that no matter what you do in SM, both partners should be of one
sensuality with one another.
Real-life sadists and masochists are choosy about their ordeals and
choosy about their partners. The kind of suffering a sadist wants
to inflict says nothing about the masochist, but much about the sadist,
who must accept that truth about self. The amount of suffering is
limited by how much the sadist can take responsibility for -
including the masochist's post-party affections, when the handcuffs
come off. So, behind our appearances, our fantasies, and the games
we may play, SM is something that spouses, lovers and friends
learn to do together.
SM can be gentle as a feather or rough as a crucifixion. But what
games you play, how long, how hard and how real - all that is up
to you and your partner.Some sadomasochists look dangerous. They're
giving signals for rough games - which they know how to play and
are ready for. If you're not ready, keep away. They take themselves
seriously, and so should you.
Much of SM is easy fun and no more dangerous than driving a car. But,
like driving, you must do it right. We always have a few who do SM
drunk, stoned or without knowing what they're doing. This is as serious
as driving drunk, or without knowing how to drive. Most of us are careful
and safety-minded. Outside the drug and heavy-drinking set, serious
accidents in SM are rare.
How Do People Become Sadomasochists?
Some individuals discover it on their own - even in early childhood -
playing their own games with pain, bondage, isolation and other stress.
Some couples discover it as they explore for more patterns of erotic play.
Some individuals learn SM from spouses, lovers, or friends. Some read
about SM, get turned on and start looking for it in real life. Some who
feel guilty, inadequate or insecure are attracted to the security of SM
role-playing.
How Do I Tell If I'm Into SM?
There are two cases. If you often have SM fantasies, of having power
over someone you desire, or of someone you desire having power over
you, then you are a latent sadomasochist. If you often are in fact
dominant or submissive in your loveplay, but without putting a name
to it, again, you are a latent sadomasochist.
In either case, whether you are fantasizing dominance and submission
without doing it or doing dominance and submission without naming it,
coming out into SM means your conscious acceptance of domination and
submission as an important key to your eroticism. Then you can begin
to become yourself more fully and deliberately.
Some people - like me, I am a hardhead - resist accepting their SM.
I once thought my fantasies were something separate from my self,
that I created my fantasies at will. But one day it dawned on me
that many other people would like to act our my fantasies with me,
and that those other people were as valid and human as I was. Immediately
I had to accept my SM fantasies as a valid and human part of myself. It
was scary; I felt out of control; my fantasies were not separate from
myself, created by my will; in fact, at their level, they defined
and created me, and my "will" had little to do with it.
But even so, I was happy - and I have never looked back. Now I think
that for most people coming out into SM is not as hard as it was for me.
Isn't it Degrading to be Submissive?
Yes and no. Humiliation is to the spirit as pain is to the body. Humiliation
can affirm a healthy ego, just as pain or stress can affirm a healthy body.
Religions use humility for spiritual development, just as sports use physical
stress for bodily development. So likewise, SM uses humiliation to eroticize
the ego, pain to eroticize the body.
Many masochists who eroticize pain reject and are offended by humiliation.
Many masochists who eroticize humiliation cannot handle pain. Likewise,
sadists seem to be chiefly into pain or humiliation. Sadists think
masochists are the most erotic people alive. So now it's your choice:
dominate or submit. Would you rather have power over a highly erotic
person (and what would you do with them?) Or would you rather be a
highly erotic person for someone with power over you? (and what would
you want them to do with you?)
Three thousand years ago, wise Homer sang, "Great joy it is
to friends and grief to foes, when with one accord man and wife
together make a home ... But they themselves best know its meaning."
SM is like that. We create our own shared reality. The opinions of
other people are not important there.
SM As Individualism Against Authority
SM opens weird, scary and fantastic places in us, and makes them
into erotic fountainheads for us and for the people we love. Many
people want those places kept shut. They suspect human nature, that
people tend toward corruption, and to get out of touch with reality.
These are also the basic ideas of authoritarianism. All authoritarian
religions and political systems see tendencies toward corruption and
disconnection from reality - often a "higher" reality,
defined by themselves, and so abstract as to defy testing.
By contrast, SM offers fantasy and play, which are universal and
natural. Also universal and natural is the ability to distinguish
fantasy and reality, which all play presumes. Even kittens know
how to play at fighting, and naturally trust others to know how
to play, too.
The stereotype enemy of SM is an authoritarian, mistrustful of
human nature (which tends to corruption and needs guidance), and
putting their trust in an authoritarian church, politics or
"science" (which is somehow not corruptible and will
do the guiding.)In SM, we can celebrate and use our diversity;
they want to impose uniform values. In SM, we can play and fulfill
our own fantasies; they want us to work and fulfill theirs. In SM
we can learn to trust; they need to control.
But pure authoritarians are rare. Ordinary people I find not all
that hostile to SM. The reason is everyone has two separate value
systems: personal and impersonal. Our personal values come from
and are applied to our family and friends, whom we love and who
love us. Our impersonal values, presumed uniform-for-everyone,
come from our religion, culture and politics, and are applied to
"other people," not so close to us. Our family and
friends are good, despite their faults. Other people are suspect,
despite their virtues.
All history shows that universal value systems, political or
religious, have never brought peace and trust, only wars,
inquisitions and purges. Even on the most personal level, I
resent religious or political evangelists pushing their universal
value systems on me. But I can't help liking and trusting someone
who enjoys my individuality - even if they don't agree with me.
So, to get along with people, become friends. It's simple. Never
go at their impersonal value system; but do take the time to
appreciate and enjoy their uniqueness. You don't have to agree
with it! Soon enough, they'll do the same and count you among
their friends - despite your faults.
And if you're caught in public debate against an authoritarian,
never put your own impersonal value system - however liberal -
against theirs. They've had centuries of law and theology, millions
of lawyers and theologians; their logic will be stronger than
yours and you will lose. To win, you must remember your self,
your personal experiences, your own need for love, your own ways
of loving and hating, your own spunk and humor. Everyone feels
pressed down by institutions, even their own; play your David
against their Goliath; the crowd will love it. One live person
is more real than any system, which is only an abstraction,
after all. It may not seem logical that one person can have
more power than a church or government; but that reality is
not logical. Be logical, you'll lose. Be yourself and real,
you'll win.
More About Domination and Submission
Most beginners (not all) start as submissives. Many continue
to prefer that role. In America masochists outnumber sadists by
3 to 1. One reason is that erotic submission is an easier step
from ordinary life. Most of us learn business and social success
by taking orders, being attentive, willing, energetic, polite,
and giving ego-strokes even to people we dislike. It takes
only one instant to see that such conduct may also bring
erotic success with someone that we do like - and another
masochist is born.
Another reason is that submission replays our infant dependency,
an intense period. To be a child again, what a treat! We can test
and expand our limits, be smart-alecky and punished and be
safely cared for. All we need is a parent.
A third reason for so many masochists is that submission is
easier, domination harder. Ideally the sadist has more
experience, sensitivity and technical skill; and the
investment of a playroom or dungeon with its fittings,
plus carrying the main responsibility for safety and
success. Good sadists are rare. (Though really good
masochists aren't so common, either.
For the same reason, don't look down on professional
dominatrixes or sadists, who do SM for money. They are
usually very, very good.
Experience and sensitivity usually count for more in SM
than youth and looks. It takes years to make a good sadist
or masochist and age is an advantage. Sadists who have also
been masochists are prized: they know.
Submissive is not the same as passive. Passives are inert.
Submissives, in their desire to be controlled, may provoke,
resist, scream and holler and even fight back. They are often
great exhibitionists, loving mirrors and dramatic scenes.
Likewise dominant is not the same as aggressive. Dominants
are often shy, calculating, reserved and voyeuristic.
Most beginners start as either dominant or submissive.
(Which are you?) But more than 95% of us eventually
discover both dominant and submissive impulses. Fewer
than 5% stay totally dominant or submissive all the
time. These opposite impulses in the same person usually
seek opposite objects or circumstances for expression:
|
|
|
-
dominate with humiliation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
dominate in Fantasy (common!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is your pattern here? These also reverse. Bisexuals, transvestites
and transsexuals often change SM roles in crossing the sex line.
The Walter Mittys of the world are powerless in reality, powerful
in fantasy; while bully cops are scolded by their wives at home
and politicians submit to their dominatrixes. I know of one woman
who submitted to gay men, dominated straight ones (no Lesbian,
she!) Sexism is only one of the many SM patterns; no wonder
it so seldom works.
Limits - The Key to SM
The word limits is frequent in SM. It refers to degrees or
kinds of experience not wanted by the masochist: "no
marks," "no scat," "light spanking
only," "no public," and so on.
Beginning masochists, afraid of excesses, want their
limits respected. Most masochists like to have their
limit tested and expanded. Some SM ads say "no limits"
a search for an experienced partner. And sadists also
have limits: degrees or areas which turn them off.
Such are the usual idea of limits; but they go much
further. All eroticism, including SM, occurs at our
surfaces or boundaries or limits. The rubbing, physical
or emotional, that focuses our attention so wonderfully,
occurs just where we interface with external reality.
And this is true of both emotional and physical eroticism.
Our limits mark the boundaries of our perceived self. Our
fantasies mark the boundaries of an imaginary self. SM is
the art of playing with our limits and our fantasies. Our
limits and our fantasies are in us, not in our games. Thus,
all SM games are variable and negotiable.
-
Pain can be symbolic, light or heavy.
-
Scat can be symbolic, light or heavy.
-
Bondage can be symbolic, light or heavy.
-
Whipping can be symbolic, light or heavy.
-
Discipline can be symbolic, light or heavy.
-
Humiliation can be symbolic, light or heavy.
And so on. Sadists learn to gauge their masochists and work accordingly.
The kind of pain or humiliation must reflect their fantasies. The
amount of it must be enough to eroticize the masochist's limits,
though too much may be destructive and a turn-off.
My joy as a sadist is not in the outer act, but in feeling the
limits of my masochist, just right, so I can touch the living
spirit inside of who or what they think they are. My joy as a
masochist is not in the outer act, but in being touched and
felt, just right, even inside of who or what I think I am.
Growth and eroticism are the same. Both challenge and develop
our limits and our fantasies. SM, by pursuing our fantasies,
leads us back towards where our fantasies begin and first take
form, from our unformed primary energy. That is where we come
from, with all our loves and hates. To know that place brings
wisdom, power, peace and joy. Our limits are not the end of
our journey in to SM, only its beginning.
What People Do in SM
Most people think of SM as bondage, whipping, scat, pain,
humiliation and so on. And in fact, SM has dozens and dozens
of games, each one astonishing and more always being invented.
But they are all games of playing and discovering our limits
and fantasies.
This is why many sadomasochists like to negotiate our games
as we go along. We're all different, in how we touch and need
to be touched; at different times; with different people; and
the process of eroticism itself also changes us. This is why
it's so hard for beginners to begin. You don't know where or
how to start. You can't be sure what's play and what's real.
You can't be sure if people can be trusted or how far they'll
go. It's like trying to get on a merry-go-round while it's
going.
Beginners always ask what we do in SM. They want security
before they venture, which is natural. But the real question
is not what we do. The real question is how do you find security
in a game without set limits? But that's exactly what SM is:
discovering and playing with our limits.
The insecurity of beginners is natural. If you're a beginner,
be direct about it. Just tell people you're new. Ask for advice.
Ask people if they'd do a limited scene with you. Experienced
sadomasochists know how important trust is. We were all beginners
once. Only a real clod ever puts down an honest beginner. The
least you should get is respect for being honest. You should
also get some good advice. You may get a referral. If everything
is right, you may get a scene with that person. And you may make
a friend - someone you can trust.
About Trust
Kissinger once said power is the ultimate aphrodisiac. A masochist
responded, "So is trust!" As the masochist must give
power to the sadist, the sadist must provide trust for the masochist.
How sadists do this is worth another essay; what follows is for
beginning masochists. Before you let someone tie you up, how do
you know if you can trust them? Sadomasochists always talk about
trust, gut feeling, intuitions and the vibrations we may pick up.
But such feelings are tricky. They require calm in the middle of
excitement, and they may come from subliminal observations. Always
pay attention to your intuitions, become conscious of them and look
for tangible signs to support or deny them. Here is a list of tangible
signs of trust.
References:
If friends tell you someone has tortured and raped 50 people with
uniformly good results, then you can expect good results for yourself
as the 51st. People who are well known but hard to get to know may
have long waiting lines. People who are unknown are suspect.
Alcohol, pot and other drugs seem to heighten awareness for some,
disconnect others. Some sadomasochists have been successful users
for years; others claim that even one beer is too desensitizing.
At least be clear about your own uses and those of your partner.
Do new SM experimenting when both of you are "straight."
And never do SM with anyone whose uses are different or greater than
your own; that way at least you won't sink on someone else's ship.
Self humor:
SM, the subculture that pursues fantasy, is rich in humor, which
must arise when fantasy confronts reality. People who like to tell
or take a joke on themselves know and enjoy the difference between
reality and their own fantasy. Those you can trust. People lacking
self-humor are suspect.
Afford their habits:
A successful narcotics dealer once told me his secret of success:
the good guys were those who could afford their habits. Other
clients he gently referred on to other dealers. Everyone, each
of us, has habits: economic, social, emotional, intellectual,
political, esthetic, hobbies, whatever, which, if we are off-balance,
can become as demanding as any drugs. People who can afford their
habits are likely to be Ok in SM, others not.
Personal Affirmation:
People with family and friends who they love and who love them are
likely to be trustworthy. People whose affirmation comes from impersonal
sources, church, state, politics, "science," are suspect.
Some Advertisers:
People who place sex ads have done something remarkable: they have
defined themselves erotically for other people. Score one point.
Those who describe themselves objectively, score two points. Objectively
with humor, three points and bullseye. If they focus entirely on the
fantasy that they think they want, score zero.
Appreciate Uniqueness:
In some gay leatherbars, after mutual attraction has been established,
SM partners may spend an hour getting to know one another, before
beginning even verbal SM play; even who will be dominant, who
submissive, may be delayed. What they are doing is discovering
one another's uniqueness, to use it as the basis for their SM
play. People who take the time to discover and appreciate your
uniqueness can probably be trusted; offers of instant play are
only fetishism and suspect.
All these signs are tests of whether a person is reality-oriented.
Unreal people of course are not bad people; but they are not
trustworthy for SM, where you share and develop your fantasies.
Some Ideas for Beginners
Learning SM is like learning to ski or to ride a bicycle. Expect
some fumbling and wobbling at first. As with any art, you will
get better and better.
Start easy. The fantasies of virgins are notoriously excessive
and impractical. Try just a blindfold, pretend-bondage and
talking in dominant-submissive roles.
Try SM with someone you like and trust: a spouse, lover or
close friend. SM can only enrich what you already share.
Don't ask people what they do in SM; it's a no-win. Do tell
people you're a beginner, ask for advice and maybe for a
limited scene.
Beginning masochists naturally fear SM could get out of hand.
Agree on a "safe word" like "pumpkin" or
any nonsense word, as a signal for "stop." Some
like "green" for "more," "yellow"
for "ease up" and "red" for "stop."
Learn from yourself. Try bondage, fetish clothing, pain, SM toys,
etc., in front of a mirror. Take pictures.
Write your own sex ad, even if you'll never publish it. For beginners
it's a remarkable discovery of self-image. You'll rewrite it tomorrow!
Call all the SM ads you can find. Tell them you're new and ask for
advice. Don't skip the gays, nor the commercials nor the straights.
Try to talk to the person behind the ad, not to a projected fantasy
role.
Talk to people already into SM. Many of us will talk and listen for
hours.
Survey your friends about dominant-submissive loveplay. Don't use
"SM" or "sadomasochism"; these words may be
too strong. See how much there is.
Call your local sex hotline. Ask for someone who knows about SM.
(In San Francisco, it's
S.F.S.I.,
415-665-7300, Mon-Fri, 3-9 PM).Volunteer to serve on the hotline.
Great training, great people.
Take courses in sexuality; many are open to non-degree students.
Explore SM bars, shops, clubs; get leads from one to another.
Join SM clubs for friends, support, partners.
Get a private mailbox; write to other people into SM.
If you pay for commercial SM partners, use those that practice SM
in their own lives. Same prices, big difference in quality and caring.
Answer SM ads. Meet on neutral ground if you're nervous. Most are
responsible. It's OK not to like them all!
Place your own ad, emphasizing what you have to offer, not your
fantasy. Your phone number will bring some freak calls; a call
asking what you charge may be the vice squad, doing their homework.
(Answer "mutual pleasure." That price is too high for them!)
Freak calls and vice baiting are fun, but a private mailbox will
probably bring comparable serious replies.Discount the sleaze;
that's just our anti-sex culture. As in any subculture, some
sifting in SM will turn up many fine people. Good luck
there!
Postscript
This essay attempts an introduction to SM. However, there is
a problem in "teaching" SM. SM is an experiential
discipline, like music, which you cannot understand without
experiencing it yourself; and SM has the extra twist that what
you experience is your own erotic self. However, everyone is
different and SM, the discipline which takes us into ourselves,
is seen differently by different people. Thus, someone else
doing an introductory essay about SM might do it all different
- everything - and be perfectly right, too. So when you encounter
quite different ideas of what SM is, not to worry, it is still
all the same.
Also, then, be clear that this essay, like any other writing about
SM, offers only words and abstractions about something which can
be real only as personal experience, inside you. It may comfort
some, or interest others, to read a verbal theory about SM; but
a whole library of books and films on SM will not teach you as
much as the first time that you yourself put handcuffs onto someone
you desire, or that someone who desires you puts them onto you. At
that moment you will begin to experience your erotic self, not
indirectly, in words and concepts, nor as a fixed given, but
directly, and as a willed variable (your will or someone else's).
And that is why SM is at once so important, so terrifying and so
joyous.
SM leads us on important journeys back into ourselves. They are important
because the self we return to has changed and grown. SM is a development
of our uniqueness, our reality, our limits, our fantasies. We become
different in how we can love and be loved. We sadomasochists learn to
do SM without knowing in advance just how it will turn out - no limits! -
because we have learned how to trust ourselves and one another.
We have become children again and learned how to play.
Ecstasy skates the glittering seas of passion,
Speeding on the thinnest edge of fantasy and
madness...faster!...faster!Laughing, exhausted, we stop.
What strange place is this?
What strange shapes?
Oh! Now I see. We are home.
Dedicated with deepest affection to The Benevolent Autocrat.
© Copyright Don Miesen, 1981.
NOTE:
The
Benevolent Autocrat
was a gentlemen who used to run ads looking for BDSM partners in
the Northern California underground newspaper,
The Berkeley Barb,
in the late 1960s and 1970s. He also gave several lectures about
SM to college groups in the 1970s. Don Miesen, the author of
What Is SadoMasochism
considered him to be his Mentor.
|